logologologo
  • About
    • Meet Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Corporate Transparency Act
    • Copyrights
    • Employment Law
    • Franchising
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
    • Mediation
    • Patents
    • Technology Licensing
    • Trade Secrets
    • Trademarks
  • Industries Served
    • Innovations & Inventions
    • Small Businesses
    • Business-to-Business
    • Technology & Software
    • Consumer Products
    • Engineering & Manufacturing
    • Bio-Tech & Medical
    • Architecture & Construction
    • Vehicles & Transportation
  • The Brief
  • Contact
logologologo
  • About
    • Meet Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Corporate Transparency Act
    • Copyrights
    • Employment Law
    • Franchising
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
    • Mediation
    • Patents
    • Technology Licensing
    • Trade Secrets
    • Trademarks
  • Industries Served
    • Innovations & Inventions
    • Small Businesses
    • Business-to-Business
    • Technology & Software
    • Consumer Products
    • Engineering & Manufacturing
    • Bio-Tech & Medical
    • Architecture & Construction
    • Vehicles & Transportation
  • The Brief
  • Contact
  • About
    • Meet Our Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Corporate Transparency Act
    • Copyrights
    • Employment Law
    • Franchising
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
    • Mediation
    • Patents
    • Technology Licensing
    • Trade Secrets
    • Trademarks
  • Industries Served
    • Innovations & Inventions
    • Small Businesses
    • Business-to-Business
    • Technology & Software
    • Consumer Products
    • Engineering & Manufacturing
    • Bio-Tech & Medical
    • Architecture & Construction
    • Vehicles & Transportation
  • The Brief
  • Contact
icon for Kim and Lahey law firmby Kim, Lahey & Killough Law Firm
UncategorizedJanuary 11, 20212 comments

Patent Victory Seen as a Win for Photo Industry

ImageQuix's Blueprint, School Picture Software

A recent decision by the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals is being hailed as a big win for the photo industry. The 2-year battle revolves around a company’s attempt to enforce a software patent, contending it owned exclusive rights to a data processing system for grouping photographs together.

The Kim & Lahey Law Firm represented the plaintiff, ImageQuix, a software company that was based in Greenville, SC, until recently moving to Raleigh, NC. ImageQuix is a pioneer in the online photo sales industry and has serviced professional photographers for more than 20 years.

In fall of 2018, Snapizzi, a Washington state corporation, began contacting ImageQuix about its patented image tagging technology (U.S. Patent 8,794,506). ImageQuix had just released Blueprint, their latest photography workflow software that also includes image tagging to sort and organize large volumes of images.

Snapizzi insisted they purchase a license in order to continue offering image tagging. In reviewing the patent with its counsel, Doug Kim, ImageQuix President Alex Kovacevic decided to take the dispute head on. ImageQuix filed a lawsuit asking to the court to hold that Snapizzi’s patent was invalid and not infringed. ImageQuix stated that photo tagging technology was not new to the industry and that the Snapizzi patent was invalid. Snapizzi snapped back with a counterclaim alleging patent infringement.

In December of 2019, the District court ruled the Patent was invalid under the now famous United States Supreme Court 2014 ruling Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank. Alice held that a computer implemented electronic escrow service was an “abstract idea” and therefore ineligible for patent protection under 35 USC § 101. In response, Snapizzi appealed to the Federal Court that hears all patent appeals. Last week, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court holding that the Snapizzi patent was invalid.

Rich Scanlon, CEO, ImageQuix, says, “It’s never an easy decision to take on the burden of a long court proceeding, but we felt it was our duty as industry leaders to go on the offensive. This ruling is also vindication for the school photo industry as a whole.  We fought back against those who would try to take credit for, and advantage of, the collective innovations our entire industry has invested immense resources in.  We can, and should, all share in this victory.”

“We could not stand by and allow innovation to be challenged and stifled. I am proud to be a part of a company that cares and always does the right thing,” says Tim McCain, CRO of ImageQuix and Founder of PhotoLynx.

“From the beginning, we believed that the Snapizzi patent was invalid and that its claims were in violation of the Alice ruling. We’re happy that both the District Court and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with us,” says Doug Kim.

Although the Alice opinion did not specify that all software is patent ineligible, the case is widely considered as a decision against software patents or patents on software for business methods. Patent eligibility rules are supposed to keep patents from being issued that cover ineligible subject matter, which the U.S. Supreme Court determined in its Alice decision constitutes the “basic tools of scientific and technological work” so as not to impede innovation and undermine patent laws.

“While Alice introduced hurdles to patenting software, understanding these rules and rulings allows a patent to be written to minimize the risk and even avoid § 101 rejections,” said Doug Kim, a former software programmer and now patent attorney.

Tags:
Alice Opinion patent patent infringement patent law patent litigation software patents
Kim & Lahey Law Firm Named to “Best Law Firms” List 2021Prev
Strategies for Buying or Selling a Business During a PandemicNext

Latest Posts

by Kim, Lahey & Killough Law Firm

2025 South Carolina Super Lawyers

Five Kim, Lahey & Killough attorneys named in 2025 South Carolina Super Lawyers Kim, Lahey & Killough is pleased to announce that five of its...

2025 South Carolina Super Lawyers

Celebrating Success, NewsApril 29, 2025
by Kim, Lahey & Killough Law Firm

DeepSeek AI Risks

If you vendor is using DeepSeek, It's time to find another one. Last week the United States stock market saw a massive sell-off principally due to an...

DeepSeek AI Risks

Commentary, NewsMarch 18, 2025
by Kim, Lahey & Killough Law Firm

BOIR CTA new reporting deadline

February 28, 2025 If you have been tracking the movement of the Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting and Corporate Transparency Act as it makes its...

BOIR CTA new reporting deadline

Commentary, News, UncategorizedFebruary 28, 2025
logo

Kim, Lahey & Killough Law Firm is devoted to helping clients establish, enforce, and leverage their intellectual property rights. With our client-centric focus, we seek to understand your needs and customize legal solutions that best achieve your goals and budgets.


Any results the lawyer or law firm may have achieved on behalf of clients in other matters does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.
  

Practice Areas

  • Patent Law
  • Trademark Law
  • Copyright Law
  • Trade Secrets
  • Technology Contracts & Licensing
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Business and Corporate Law
  • ADR - Mediation
  • Employment Law
  • Franchising

Featured Industries Served

  • Small Businesses
  • Business-to-Business
  • Technology & Software
  • Consumer Products
  • Engineering & Manufacturing
  • Innovations & Inventions
  • Biotech & Medical
  • Architecture & Construction
  • Vehicles & Transportation

Contact Information

Upstate SC
Mailing address:
3620 Pelham Road, PMB #213
Greenville, SC 29615
Office: 864.973.6688

Lowcountry SC
147 Wappoo Creek Drive, Suite 202
Charleston SC 29412
Office: 843.577.9800


Western NC
22 West Main Street, Unit 2
Brevard NC 28712
Office: 864.973.6688

Legal Disclaimer | Copyright © 2025 Kim, Lahey & Killough Law Firm

Meet Emily Bohan

Name(Required)
Address
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.